A typologist observes that in languages with postpositions, the genitive almost always precedes the noun. Which implication regarding language universals most accurately describes this phenomenon?

💡 Explanation

The implication observed is that languages with postpositions tend to exhibit a genitive-noun order, rather than the reverse. This represents implicational universals, because the presence of postpositions suggests a pre-genitive ordering; therefore, languages that have postpositions will likely have pre-genitive word order, rather than other possible arrangements.

• Why does misinterpreting a culture-specific idiom lead to communication breakdown in intercultural interactions, compared to literal phrases?
• A community aims to prevent language endangerment through immersion programs for children. Which mechanism most directly strengthens intergenerational transmission, mitigating language shift?
• A robotic assistant receives a series of commands, including 'Put that over there,' but loses its spatial map intermittently. Which failure mode is most likely, preventing correct action?
• When pre-lexical editors encounter tone sandhi in contour-tone languages, which consequence follows regarding the perception of word boundaries?
• When a frequently used discourse marker loses its original semantic content within a language, which consequence most accurately characterizes this diachronic process?
• Why does a listener infer an unstated request for silence when a librarian states 'People are trying to study' in a library?