Live Quiz Arena
🎁 1 Free Round Daily
⚡ Enter ArenaQuestion
← HistoryDuring a Roman siege, which outcome results when sappers undermine a defensive wall foundation with unstable soil?
A)Catastrophic wall collapse under load✓
B)Gradual settling causing minor cracks
C)Formation of impenetrable groundwater barrier
D)Increased wall stability from soil compaction
💡 Explanation
When undermining a wall with poor soil, soil liquefaction occurs because the destabilizing saturated ground loses strength under stress, leading to sudden, uneven settlement and collapse. Therefore catastrophic collapse results, rather than gradual cracks, a barrier, or stability, which require different soil conditions or interactions.
🏆 Up to £1,000 monthly prize pool
Ready for the live challenge? Join the next global round now.
*Terms apply. Skill-based competition.
Related Questions
Browse History →- Within early bronze cannons, which risk increased due to repeated firing?
- Which risk increases when copper used in Early Bronze Age axe heads incorporates high arsenic concentrations?
- Which astronomical calculation was simplified by the use of the alidade on an astrolabe?
- Which structural effect necessitates specific orientation relative prevailing wind direction during ziggurat construction?
- Which risk increased when Roman siege engineers undermined fortress walls with tunnels during the siege of Alesia?
- Which optical consequence resulted from Ibn al-Haytham using pinhole apertures?
