Live Quiz Arena
🎁 1 Free Round Daily
⚡ Enter ArenaQuestion
← HistoryDuring siege warfare, which countermeasure reduced effectiveness of Roman ballista siege engines targeting city walls?
A)Soaking walls diminishing impact force
B)Constructing moats reducing engine range
C)Employing covered passageways minimizing threat
D)Building slanted aprons deflecting projectiles✓
💡 Explanation
When ballista projectiles impacted walls, slanted masonry aprons diverted and deflected projectiles transferring tangential momentum because this changed the effective angle of incidence, reducing penetration. Therefore aprons reduced ballista effectiveness, rather than soaking, moats, or passageways which mitigate alternate attack forms.
🏆 Up to £1,000 monthly prize pool
Ready for the live challenge? Join the next global round now.
*Terms apply. Skill-based competition.
Related Questions
Browse History →- Which mechanism allowed medieval masons to construct taller Gothic cathedral walls with large windows?
- Which outcome occurs when iron production introduced coke fuel into blast furnaces during the Industrial Revolution?
- Which process limitation constrained the use of arsenic bronze in ancient Mesopotamia despite its benefits?
- Which consequence results from incorrectly tempering a gladius during Roman siege warfare weapon manufacture?
- Which factor critically influenced the success of Roman siege towers despite advancements in defensive fortifications?
- Which navigational error increases most significantly due to fluctuations in 18th-century chronometer escapement?
