Live Quiz Arena
🎁 1 Free Round Daily
⚡ Enter ArenaQuestion
← HistoryWhich consequence resulted from inadequately maintained tar on Viking longships?
A)Increased chance of hogging✓
B)More rapid keel erosion found
C)Reduced oar efficiency existed
D)Elevated sailcloth UV degradation
💡 Explanation
Hogging, where the ship's ends droop, increases because water intrusion weakens the hull as the tar degrades; the weakened hull loses longitudinal stiffness. Therefore, structural failure risk escalates, rather than just keel erosion or impaired oar usage.
🏆 Up to £1,000 monthly prize pool
Ready for the live challenge? Join the next global round now.
*Terms apply. Skill-based competition.
Related Questions
Browse History →- Which risk increases when a medieval trebuchet bridge uses insufficiently lubricated capstan bearings?
- Which effect limited image resolution in early Islamic-era concave mirrors used for burning during sieges?
- Which risk increased during the expansion of ancient Mesopotamian irrigation canals beyond natural river floodplains?
- Which structural issue caused earthen fortifications like motte-and-baileys to require continuous maintenance during siege conditions?
- Which risk increased on 18th-century wooden warships primarily due to the galvanic corrosion mechanism?
- Which water management adaptation helped sustain chinampa agriculture productivity in highland Mesoamerica?
