Live Quiz Arena
🎁 1 Free Round Daily
⚡ Enter ArenaQuestion
← HistoryWhich risk increased when iron became widely used in Roman siege engine construction, compared to bronze?
A)Increased catapult range due to lighter density
B)Catastrophic collapse due to sudden brittle fracture✓
C)Decreased engine weight for faster assembly
D)Improved protection against fire damage
💡 Explanation
When iron replaced bronze in siege engines, catastrophic brittle fracture was an increased risk because wrought iron, when stressed, could experience sudden failure without warning. Therefore collapse due to brittleness results, rather than range increase, lower weight, or improved fire protection, which are material properties not directly linked to primary historical failure mechanism.
🏆 Up to £1,000 monthly prize pool
Ready for the live challenge? Join the next global round now.
*Terms apply. Skill-based competition.
Related Questions
Browse History →- Which consequence results when the lead sheathing on a wooden ship's hull experiences prolonged immersion in seawater?
- Which optical outcome occurred when medieval Islamic scholars refined lenses using geometric principles?
- Which mechanism limited the structural height achievable in early Gothic cathedrals (12th-13th century) before flying buttresses?
- Which agricultural disadvantage becomes limiting on pre-Columbian steep terrace farms in the Andes after sustained rainfall?
- Which benefit occurred due to terrace construction combined with sophisticated irrigation in Inca maize cultivation?
- Which problem occurred frequently when ancient Mesopotamian irrigation canals silted up with sediment?
