Live Quiz Arena
🎁 1 Free Round Daily
⚡ Enter ArenaQuestion
← HistoryWhich risk increases when attacking a medieval motte-and-bailey fortification lacking advanced masonry?
A)Rapid spread of siege fires
B)Undermining by sappers becomes feasible✓
C)Reduced effectiveness of trebuchets
D)Increased vulnerability to mangonels impact
💡 Explanation
Sapping, or undermining fortress walls, becomes easier because the earthworks primarily use packed soil vulnerable to digging, not strong stone. Therefore, attackers preferred undermining methods, rather than primarily relying solely on ramming or direct fire, because fortifications resisted impact.
🏆 Up to £1,000 monthly prize pool
Ready for the live challenge? Join the next global round now.
*Terms apply. Skill-based competition.
Related Questions
Browse History →- Which outcome arose when Roman road construction exceeded specified aggregate depth?
- During celestial navigation improvements in the Islamic Golden Age, which risk increased due to imperfections in astrolabe angle measurement?
- Which limiting factor constrained the maximum size of pre-Columbian chinampa agricultural islands in Mesoamerica?
- Which risk increased for Roman legionnaires besieging a city whose defenders used Archimedes' heat ray?
- Which outcome arises during the early stages of damascus steel production due to uneven tungsten cementite distribution?
- Which constraint limited the muzzle velocity of early gunpowder weapons?
