Live Quiz Arena
🎁 1 Free Round Daily
⚡ Enter ArenaQuestion
← HistoryWhich structural weakness contributed to the fall of Constantinople's Theodosian Walls in 1453?
A)Insufficient mortar curing time employed
B)Foundation undermining by heavy siege engines
C)Inadequate defensive tower spacing used✓
D)Excessive wall height increasing lateral force
💡 Explanation
When cannons bombarded the walls, wider tower spacing resulted in larger unsupported wall sections because fewer flanking positions allowed concentrated breaching, thus stress overwhelmed material strength. Therefore, inadequate tower spacing led to collapse, rather than mortar, foundations, nor wall slenderness issues each requiring distinct failure mechanisms.
🏆 Up to £1,000 monthly prize pool
Ready for the live challenge? Join the next global round now.
*Terms apply. Skill-based competition.
Related Questions
Browse History →- Which outcome occurs when iron production introduced coke fuel into blast furnaces during the Industrial Revolution?
- Which optical consequence arises when polishing astrolabe sighting vanes unevenly using abrasive compounds?
- Which destructive outcome resulted when Roman siege engines persistently struck a castle wall at its base,?
- Which defensive outcome resulted from counterweight trebuchets during medieval sieges against fortifications?
- Which risk increased when Roman siege engines like ballistae exceeded their design firing range?
- Which risk increased when early ironclad warships replaced wooden sailing ships in naval warfare?
