Why does coarticulation in speech production blur phonetic boundaries more for vowels than for consonants?

💡 Explanation

Vowels are more susceptible to coarticulation because their articulation involves longer duration and sustained vocal tract configurations; this allows for greater influence from neighboring sounds through gestural overlap. Therefore, formant transitions blend more, rather than consonants' shorter, more abrupt gestures that resist such assimilation.

• Within Mandarin Chinese, why do some instances of tone sandhi unexpectedly fail to apply at a prosodic domain boundary?
• Why does the stop-consonant /p/ sound different when followed by different vowels?
• Which mechanism explains why a lexicographer finds multiple, seemingly contradictory definitions for a single headword after analyzing a large language corpus?
• An experienced proofreader processes a technical document; which consequence results when encountering a sentence with low contextual predictability?
• If a computer parser encounters a sentence with deeply nested clauses that exceed its stack limit, which consequence follows?
• Why does the Berinmo language, despite lacking a general color term for 'blue', still allow speakers to effectively categorize blue objects, unlike complete colorblindness?