Why does semantic bleaching in grammaticalization lead to seemingly weaker pragmatic effects over time?

💡 Explanation

Semantic bleaching causes the original, stronger meaning of a word to fade as it becomes a grammatical marker; therefore, the pragmatic effects seem weaker because the original lexical content is no longer as salient, rather than speakers resisting the change or phonetic reduction playing a primary role.

• Why does the neural processing of iconic signs in sign language activate visual-motor cortex more strongly than arbitrary signs?
• Why does a garden-path sentence like, 'The old man the boats,' initially cause processing difficulty for readers?
• Why does accurate transliteration of ancient Akkadian cuneiform depend heavily on contextual understanding?
• Why does semantic priming effects decay faster with aging?
• A novelist uses foreshadowing extensively, but readers find the ending unsatisfying because it feels unearned. Which mechanism contributes most to this breakdown in narrative coherence?
• Why does a change in conversational topic often lead to increased reaction time during neural processing?