Why does the poverty of the stimulus argument support the theory of Universal Grammar?

💡 Explanation

The poverty of the stimulus suggests children acquire complex grammatical knowledge without sufficient explicit input because they possess innate linguistic structures, supporting Universal Grammar, therefore it suggests pre-wired knowledge rather than solely relying on environmental exposure.

• Why does semantic bleaching occur more extensively in creole languages compared to established languages?
• Why does reconstructing proto-languages using the comparative method face increasing uncertainty as time depth increases?
• A multilingual community abruptly adopts a simplified trade language (pidgin) as its primary means of communication. Which outcome becomes most probable over several generations?
• During rapid language shift in a community where Basque speakers are adopting Spanish, which outcome becomes likely regarding Basque grammar?
• A screenplay exhibits a sudden, jarring shift in genre mid-story; why does the audience experience cognitive dissonance?
• Why does a message sent over a noisy radio channel degrade in intelligibility when the signal-to-noise ratio falls below a critical threshold?