Why does a proto-language reconstruction become less certain as the time depth increases?

💡 Explanation

The uncertainty increases in proto-language reconstruction as time depth increases because the accumulation of sound changes and semantic shifts yields multiple equally plausible etymologies for words. This outcome is caused by cumulative divergence; therefore, it's harder to determine the correct ancestral form, rather than assuming stability or systematic reversal.

• Which outcome is most probable when a noisy communication channel's bandwidth is significantly increased, while the signal power remains constant?
• Why does automatic transliteration from Hindi (Devanagari) to English often produce varied spellings for the same word?
• A morpheme-parsing algorithm encounters the word 'unbreakable' – which process explains why the algorithm correctly identifies 'break' as the root, despite the presence of multiple affixes?
• Why does a child exposed to varying sentence structures within the critical period converge on a single grammatical form for expressing negation, rather than maintaining multiple forms?
• Why does semantic drift cause ambiguity in long-term archival of legal documents?
• Why does written Chinese, which employs logographic principles, exhibit relatively slower reading speeds compared to alphabetic writing systems when eye-tracking is employed?